Support Center

Is there a way to narrow down designs so a few models can be screened for retained activity? Is there a way to run multiple ddG mutations together?

Last Updated: May 11, 2017 05:16PM PDT
A common question is how to pick the best designs among the ones (already likely good energetically) that Rosetta produces. Most of our advice is here:
https://support.cyrusbio.com/customer/en/portal/articles/2659675-how-should-i-decide-how-many-repetitions-to-run-and-what-combination-of-actions-to-do-

One helpful step is to look at the MSA of outputs and build a phylogenetic tree to understand the diversity over your set, then tune your choices as described there. This is also relevant to which mutations to accept when redesigning a protein, especially just using "repack" to test your design's stability in Bench:
https://support.cyrusbio.com/customer/en/portal/articles/2659683-how-can-i-tell-if-a-designed-sequence-is-a-good-one-

ddG was calibrated empirically on thousands of real mutational data sets of single point mutations -- so it gives one free energy number for one mutation, and in our testing that free energy correlates well with experimental data. In theory one could also do such a thing for double mutations (we have a workflow for that here https://support.cyrusbio.com/customer/en/portal/articles/2717083-workflow---multiple-n-point-mutation-ddg) where we have some good evidence that it works, but for situations beyond that the theoretical assumptions of ddG start to be less valid (e.g. assuming fairly rigid backbone) and we don't have good benchmarking data to rigorously support its use, the sequence space is just too high.
ef828e56a55e7b26e25ee456cc7df695@cyrusbiotechnology.desk-mail.com
https://cdn.desk.com/
false
desk
Loading
seconds ago
a minute ago
minutes ago
an hour ago
hours ago
a day ago
days ago
about
false
Invalid characters found
/customer/en/portal/articles/autocomplete